The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing sweeping modernization, and has formally stated its intent to consider online ticket sales, along with offering its very own daily fantasy sports and social video gaming services and products.
Massachusetts was making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for a while, as it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a far more up-to-date and competitive offering that is online.
While Internet casino video gaming and poker would require a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social gaming will never ( at the least within the Bay State), plus it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating a unique fantasy sports item as a means attractive to the younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of newer, mobile-friendly trends.
As a result, the state has launched a formal request information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, functional support, and maintenance of a Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read a statement that is official.
This would include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and lottery that is new, including but not restricted to social gaming and daily dream sports choices.’
Of specific interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, aswell as recommendations for responsible video gaming controls.
The commission also states that it’s wrestling with ways of integrating lottery admission retailers to be able to protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small depend on lottery sales commissions.
‘We think the introduction of a dream activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace an emerging market while continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News Service recently.
‘ This type that is particular of would perhaps not cannibalize our existing products. It might obviously be a new product. It might help us club player casino bonus codes 2018 to activate that which we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also assist Lottery to create a revenue that is new in contrast to eroding or maintaining existing offers.’
Throughout the edge in nyc State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has been railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature for the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared there are no federal or state laws that preclude such sites from operating.
Healy has proposed full regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has stated that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ which they are breaking the law.
After all, there’s nothing wrong with adopting just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, born and bred in Boston, is perhaps benefitting from being truly a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Former India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
Asia is one step closer to legalizing activities betting and gambling after having a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the gaming that is longstanding in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion individuals, India is the second-most country that is populated the globe.
Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to your Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized activities gambling would offer more transparency and reduce rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would serve both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market must be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to ensure that players and those with direct ties to sports matches are barred from participating.
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as president, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.
The lengthy investigation by Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The widespread match-fixing and unlawful wagering led the BCCI to do something to improve its infrastructure and appear for ways to mend its moral standing.
The acts that are criminal resulted in intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to remove unlawful betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is the absolute most popular task in India, and even though the sport’s governing body claims it wants to completely clean up its league, the federal government might not be so eager to ending gambling prohibition.
Except for horse racing, gambling in Asia is illegal for almost 150 years.
In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline also shows transforming the BCCI’s energy structure and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report thus far.
The choice to authorize gaming and activities betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on the state and levels that are federal.
‘ The federal government will likely leave it alone as it remains a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has largely been a states’ rights topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, simply three have taken steps to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can offer substantial revenues and monies for local governments, many in India believe any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and cash laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s already there, albeit illegally, and that swift action should be taken.
‘With big money and attention, there is not the caution that is necessary protect the game and its players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.
Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system day. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A second PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing to produce a dent that is discernible at least on the internet site’s traffic figures.
Around 1,600 players signed up for the protest, according to organizers.
Per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the initial day’s the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, when comparing to the same day the previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same time the previous week.
Of course, it’s impossible to learn just how much the sudden dearth of high stakes players has effects on PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to sit out have in reality proved real to their word.
The boycott, which is due to end Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups including WeArePokerPlayers.com and Tiltbook.com, also a quantity of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards a major overhaul to the VIP system, which took effect on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would add scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement with this status being a two-year procedure.
PokerStars claims that the modifications are designed to improve the poker ecology, however they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent some of the website’s avid that is most, long-lasting, and high-ranking players, they are net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the on-line poker giant is anxious to attract.
The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained comparable, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot rewards.
While PokerStars is probable to have raked less through that period, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.
‘During the boycott that is three-day recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem link between the entire year with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they have all 12 months,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The players that are affected undeterred, nevertheless, and are determined showing PokerStars they can make the operator’s life difficult.
And more boycotts are planned in the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign seeking 5,000 signatures to accept at least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by just as much as 30 percent.
On New Year’s time, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the modifications, following example of Alex Millar, whom severed ties with all the site right before the getaway period.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I am aware what it takes to rake 1M VPP in a ‘ wrote haxton on 2+2 year. ‘It’s a grind that is tough. For some of the players that do it, it is a commitment that is all-consuming intense than most full-time jobs.
‘Many of them have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just as you approach the finish line, that your efforts won’t be rewarded as you expected them to be is brutal. I cannot in good conscience continue to endorse a poker site that treats its players this real way.’